Diferențe
Aici sunt prezentate diferențele dintre versiunile selectate și versiunea curentă a paginii.
|
imi:strategia:impactul_general [2018/11/17 10:36] |
imi:strategia:impactul_general [2020/08/01 12:14] (curent) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linia 1: | Linia 1: | ||
| + | ~~SLIDESHOW~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== The IMI Network ====== | ||
| + | - What is the Internal Market Information System (IMI)? | ||
| + | - Why do we need an Internal Market Information System? | ||
| + | - What benefits does IMI deliver? | ||
| + | - How does IMI work? | ||
| + | - Strategy for expanding and developing IMI | ||
| + | - IMI in the future | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 1. What is the Internal Market Information System? ===== | ||
| + | * IMI is a multilingual electronic tool for exchange of information between Competent Authorities throughout the European Economic Area | ||
| + | * IMI is developed by the European Commission in partnership with the Member States | ||
| + | * IMI was financed and set up as a "Project of common interest" under the IDABC Work Programme (2005-2009) | ||
| + | * IMI facilitates communication between public administrations at national, regional and local level since 2008 | ||
| + | * Competent Authorities of the 30 EEA Member States can contact each other via IMI | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== IMI is one system with customised applications for different Directives ===== | ||
| + | * COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND NATIONAL EXPERTS | ||
| + | * CA DATA | ||
| + | * QUESTION SET GENERATOR | ||
| + | * QUESTIONS | ||
| + | * LANGUAGE SUPPORT | ||
| + | * Information exchange | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 2. Why do we need an IMI System? ===== | ||
| + | Making legislation work better for citizens and business: | ||
| + | * Free movement of goods, services, people and capital depends on a complex mixture of rules (EU and national level) | ||
| + | * Ensuring compliance with the rules is the responsibility of public authorities at local, regional and national level across the European Economic Area (EEA) | ||
| + | * Public authorities need to cooperate closely to ensure that the full benefits of the legal framework are delivered for citizens and businesses | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 2. Why do we need an IMI System? (II) ===== | ||
| + | * Confidence and trust between administrations can only be established on the basis of contact and easy access to information | ||
| + | * However there are many practical barriers to cooperation, such as language or administrative structures | ||
| + | * Administrative cooperation will not happen spontaneously – it needs support, particularly in a larger more diverse Europe | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Administrative cooperation - The legal obligations ===== | ||
| + | * IMI does not impose additional obligations on Member States beyond those already contained in internal market legislation | ||
| + | * Revised Directive on Professional Qualifications (2005/36/EC) | ||
| + | * Article 8 - Administrative cooperation | ||
| + | * Article 50 - Documentation and formalities | ||
| + | * Article 56 - Competent Authorities | ||
| + | * Services Directive (2006/123/EC) | ||
| + | * Articles 28-36 in particular articles 34.1, 36 and recital 112 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 3. What benefits does IMI deliver? ===== | ||
| + | * For Member States | ||
| + | * For Competent Authorities | ||
| + | * For migrating professionals | ||
| + | * For European Commission | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Benefits for Member States ===== | ||
| + | - Easy to use and flexible | ||
| + | - No new legal obligations | ||
| + | - A single system to manage | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Benefits for Competent Authorities ===== | ||
| + | - Easy access to information | ||
| + | - More transparent process | ||
| + | - Greater efficiency | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Benefits for migrating professionals ===== | ||
| + | - More transparent process | ||
| + | - Faster response by administrations | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Benefits for European Commission ===== | ||
| + | - Lower costs, Faster development | ||
| + | - Easy to support new legislative areas | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Result ===== | ||
| + | - Exchange of information at all levels of administration across EU becomes possible | ||
| + | - Secure and reliable system which allows complex problems to be dealt with quickly | ||
| + | - Single system to support different pieces of Internal Market legislation | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 4. How does IMI work? Actors and roles in IMI ===== | ||
| + | * European Commission | ||
| + | * Competent Authorities (CAs) | ||
| + | * IMI Coordinators (NIMIC, SDIMIC, DIMIC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== European Commission ===== | ||
| + | - develops, maintains and runs IMI (data centre Luxembourg) | ||
| + | - provides translations | ||
| + | - central Helpdesk | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Competent Authorities ===== | ||
| + | - find relevant Competent Authorities in another Member State | ||
| + | - exchange information with this CA in other Member State | ||
| + | - administer data and users of their authority in IMI | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== IMI Coordinators ===== | ||
| + | - technical/ administrative coordination, e.g. registration and support of CAs (help desk) | ||
| + | - functional coordination – by choice | ||
| + | - act as CA and exchange information through IMI with other CAs | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 4. How does IMI work? System functionality ===== | ||
| + | IMI supports cooperation between MS administrations by addressing the following problems: | ||
| + | * Language barriers – 23 official EU languages | ||
| + | * Lack of clearly identified partners in other Member States (MS) | ||
| + | * Different administrative structures and cultures | ||
| + | * Lack of administrative procedures for crossborder cooperation | ||
| + | * Management of 351 bilateral relationships in EU-27 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== IMI System functionality ===== | ||
| + | - IMI works in all official EU languages | ||
| + | - Identifying partners in IMI | ||
| + | - Flexibility for MS to organise themselves as they wish | ||
| + | * Competent Authorities may contact each other directly via IMI | ||
| + | * A MS may decide to direct all requests via the Coordinator of the CA | ||
| + | * A MS may decide to direct all replies via the Coordinator of the CA | ||
| + | * It is possible that both requests and replies are sent via Coordinators | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== IMI System functionality (2) ===== | ||
| + | - Member States have agreed the flow of information for a request in IMI | ||
| + | * The simple workflow of a request in IMI consists of 4 steps only | ||
| + | - Member States have agreed on the questions which can be asked in IMI | ||
| + | - Member States can monitor IMI to make sure that replies are on time | ||
| + | - MS manage single relationship with the IMI network instead of 31 bilateral relationships ((EC and 31 states from EEA)) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 5. Strategy for expanding and developing IMI ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * IMI was launched in November 2007 for the registration of Competent Authorities | ||
| + | * Test IMI application with real data and real information exchanges | ||
| + | * Put in place organisational structures in Member States for large-scale roll-out | ||
| + | * Set up the necessary support structures for the project | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Professional Qualifications Directive ===== | ||
| + | * Since February 2008 IMI has been supporting the exchange of information required by the revised Professional Qualifications Directive (2005/36/EC) | ||
| + | * pilot project for the 4 professions, including 2 sectoral professions | ||
| + | * Extending IMI to other Professions | ||
| + | * preference for the 5 additional sectoral professions and 2 other professions (December 2008) | ||
| + | * preference for 20 additional professions with significant migration rates (October 2009) | ||
| + | * preference for 4 professions regulated in more Member States (October 2010) | ||
| + | * general opening of system to other professions (since May 2012) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 6. IMI in the future ===== | ||
| + | * Integration of the Regulated Professions Database (RegProf) | ||